A Look at a Century of the Costs of Health Care
The three primary “sponsors” for health care costs are individuals, businesses, and government; these three categories of people are the obligators in the cost of health care. Health care services and supplies are funded, both publically and privately, through government-run programs such as Medicaid and Medicare, private health insurance, employer-based health care options, other private revenues, and out-of-pocket expenditures. Demographics and economics are constantly changing the type (and quality) of health insurance that is available, the benefits offered within specific plans, and the arrangements made to share costs. Ultimately, the rising costs of health care are passed directly to the individual through increased premiums (or employee-portion), raised co-pays, and higher deductibles. The history of health care costs covered in this article will present clear trends and indicate the often viscous cycle of cause and effect. (Cowan and Hartman, 2005)
At the beginning of the 1900s, major changes were underway that would eventually shape and define the health care system today. The early 1900s saw the American Medical Association become a powerhouse in organizing the medical field through the ushering in of national, state, and local medical associations, and no longer were physicians required to provide free care to patients in hospital settings. The most significant influential factor that would shape the future of heath care costs in the early 1900s was commenced by the railroad companies, who were the first business to offer insurance to their employees as well as providing on-the-site hospitals. These events at the begin of the century were monumental in the effect they had on shaping the future of the health care industry. (Public Broadcasting System, n.d.)
The next 40 years (1910-1950) brought more change and demonstrated the large role that the United States government, politics, insurance companies, wars, and medical advances would play in contouring the structure of health care and health care costs. In the 1910s health care reform faced stiff opposition by physicians and special interest groups; reformers held the first national insurance conference; and the medical community placed an increased focus on cleanliness within health care settings, began using antiseptics, and increased the consume of pain medication for treatment. Although clearly revolutionary in increasing quality of care, it was also the first medical advances that would raise the costs of health care. However, the war of 1917 successfully, although temporarily, placed health care reform on the “abet burner.” (Public Broadcasting System, n.d.)
The 1920s and 1930s initiated strong political involvement in health care. Politicians became complacent about health care reform in the 1920s, and it would be another decade before any political progress was made. The medical profession began to gain prestige, which led to a rise in rates charged and physician wages, which prompted the health care reform to change focus from the loss of income due to being ill to the rising costs of medical care. The Great Depression of the 1930s took attention off health care reform again while Americans were concerned with being able to retire and being insured against unemployment. The Roosevelt Administration felt tremendous pressure to reform health care, specifically the rising costs of care; however, political disagreements prevented any real progress, including the passing of the Social Security Act without it having addressed health care at all. Blue Cross took the initiative to inaugurate offering private hospital care insurance, despite being advised against such action; yet, the majority saw these prepaid health care plans as too radical. (Public Broadcasting System, n.d.)
The 1940s brought World War II and considerable governmental control over employers this would be the second step America would capture toward employer-based health care plans. During World War II, the United States government placed hefty wage and effect restrictions on employers, and to remain competitive, employers began offering group health care plans to new employees as an incentive to hire and keep an equitable workforce. Politicians finally overcame their complacency, as President Roosevelt asked Congress to pass an Economic Bill of Rights that would include the right to have access to adequate medical care, and President Truman proposed a nation-wide health care idea that would cover all Americans. However, Truman’s idea met with rigid opposition by the American Medical Association, who called Truman’s national health care plan a Communist ploy, which by the mere linking of Communism caused the plan to bomb with the American people and with Congress. (Public Broadcasting System, n.d.)
The decades from 1950 to 1980 present recurring themes: rising costs of health care, political conflicts, medical advancements, failed political attempts to reform health care and palpable changes within the medical infrastructures and within insurance companies. The second half century begins with health care costs having risen to 4.5% of the Gross National Product, proposals for hospital insurance meet dismal failure, and troubles begin brewing in Korea which causes health care reform to again take a back seat to world-wide hostilities. By the end of the decade (1950), there are new advances in the medical field, which cause hospital care costs to double. The 1960s find most Americans unable to afford insurance if they do not have employer-based health care plans, making it particularly difficult for the disabled and elderly to afford health care. The number of insurance companies exceeds 700, and high-cost medications are now being approved by most major medical insurance companies. The United States government fears that there is a shortage of medical professionals which prompts them to take measures that would entice students into the medical field, and President Lyndon Johnson signs Medicaid and Medicare into law. By the end of the decade, the number of physicians who specialize in a specific area of treatment rises by 14% to a total of 69%. (Public Broadcasting System, n.d.)
The ’70s and ’80s see tall changes in insurance policy (perpetrated mainly by the federal government). In 1970, Nixon changes the name of prepaid group health care plans to health maintenance organizations (HMO) and provides federal endorsement, assistance, and certification to insurance companies. Nixon proposes a national health care plan that is subsequently rejected, and his “War on Cancer” initializes the research and institutionalization of the National Institutes of Health. By the 1980s, health care systems have begun to follow suit of corporate America, starting a shift from public health care systems to the privatization of health care. Insurance companies start complaining that fee-for-service physician payment system is being taken advantage of, and the physician capitalization payments (payments made to providers on a contractual basis: per-member, per-month type fee that may be contingent on age, illness, gender, and set) becomes increasingly common. The federal government, under the leadership of President Reagan, changes Medicare billing from payment-by-treatment to payment-by-diagnosis which begins a similar shift with private insurance companies. (Public Broadcasting System, n.d.)
The end of the century’s common themes are rising costs, ineffective and unsustainable insurance structuring, and a financial crisis not seen since the Great Depression that places families, homes, and businesses at risk. The 1990s saw health care costs skyrocket to the tune of twice the rate of inflation; expansions in managed care provide a slight and brief respite, but by the end of the decade, more the 44 million Americans have no insurance coverage. The health care reform bills that actually made it to Congress, fail to pass, and the rising health care costs continue into the 21st Century. Employer-based insurance rates increase a whopping 131%, the cost of which is passed onto employees or dropped altogether. Direct-to-consumer advertising for medical supplies is on the rise and has the potential to lower medical costs but only by a paltry amount. Studies conducted in 2007 confirm that 1.5 million families will lose their homes to foreclosure annually due to high medical costs and more than half of all bankruptcies are linked to medical expenses, with 80% of those who filed reporting that they have major health insurance coverage. In 2009, it is expected that health care costs will reach, if not surpass, $2.5 trillion. Further advances in technology and medical procedures are expected in the coming decade, which will relieve to drive the costs of health care even higher. (National Coalition on Health Care, 2009)
The old adage that “history always repeats itself” is never clearer than with the history of the health care system in America. The clear, recurring trends are partially effective government intervention, medical advances that drive the cost of health care up, along with wars, political unrest, and economic downturns that distract from the health care costs of Americans. The United States government provides small interventions that are only partially effective, followed by long periods of time in which the governing officials attempt to distance themselves from the unpleasantness of the health care reality or are too overwhelmed by the sheer complexity of a solution to the problem to mobilize in a promising direction. Medical advances increase the quality of care, but also serve to drive up the costs of health care. Wars, political unrest, and economic downturns serve to temporarily remove focus from health care while the health care crises continue to grow astronomically. It is clear the current infrastructure and regulations are ineffective, yet there does not seem to be a solution in sight.
Health Care Worker Shortage
Being able to have quality health service delivery is dependent upon having the right resources; those resources are equipment, information, medications, finances, and perhaps most importantly, highly motivated and skilled staff. The 1960’s experienced a physician and medical professional shortage that prompted the federal government to offer incentive to entice students into the medical field and expanding existing programs and schools (Public Broadcasting System, n.d.). Beginning in 2005, the Association of American Medical Colleges recognized that the United States is again facing a similar shortage of medical workers. State and federal government leaders met at a conference held by the Association of American Medical Colleges as the first step to getting the political cogs turning. The general consensus is that the situation will become much grimmer within the next 15 years, if no steps are taken to true the situation. (Simon, 2009)
A Vicious Cycle
Employees can expect to pay even more in 2010 for health care coverage. Employers are passing the rising costs of health care onto their employees. This may include higher deductibles, more out-of-pocket expenses, higher co-pays, and higher insurance premiums. The government accelerate programs, Medicare and Medicaid, do not pay health care providers anywhere arrive the actual cost of services and products received, so these costs are transferred onto insured clientele, resulting in the increase in private insurance premiums. The rising costs of insurance premiums results in fewer health plans being offered to employers but at higher rates. Employers are looking to reduce costs and save money, fair as their employees are; cutting costs on insurance premiums is an easy way for employers to save money while ultimately increasing the out-of-pocket expenses for the employee. (Kavilanz, 2009)
Government Attempts to Control Rising Costs of Health Care
Government attempts to control health care spending have thus far been hugely unsuccessful. The government attempted to control the costs of health care spending through Medicare and Medicaid which was established in the 1960s by President Johnson (Public Broadcasting System, n.d.). In 2006, total health care spending averaged $19,000 per household; approximately 58% ($11,000 per household) was in the form of government-subsidized healthcare (Medicare and Madicaid). By the end of 2010, inflation-adjusted government healthcare spending is projected to grow to an average of $13,000 per household. Costs of healthcare are expected to climb to 25.8% of total government out lays in (2008) and 28.4% in 2010. Overall national healthcare costs are likely to increase even further with the implementation of Medicare prescription drug coverage. Medicare accounted for 38% of public spending on healthcare in 2005, and it has grown an average of 9.3% annually since 2002. The cost per beneficiary has continually been increasing faster than the per capita growth of the economy, and Medicare actuaries can see no waste in sight. Because of Medicare and Medicaid, the government portion of the nation’s healthcare burden has steadily increased, but the majority of health care funding continues to settle on the shoulders of employers and consumers. (Steuerle, 2007)
The Medicare Drug Prescription Plan, initiated in 2006, provides a crucial serve to many seniors on a fixed income; however, it had a rocky start, as many recipients were confused regarding the admission process, and seniors were largely unaware of what their options were. The multiple private plans offered a number of choices, but the insurance lingo was difficult for many seniors to comprehend. The 37% of Americans who have no prescription drug coverage indicates that the quandary is precarious at best, yet, it remains most grave for seniors, who narrate 12% of the 37% of the population that have no prescription drug coverage. The Medicare Prescription Drug benefit only covers partial drug costs, the rest remain out of pocket, which presents a huge dilemma for those on a fixed income. For the rest of the population, however, particularly those who remain uninsured, the high cost of prescription medication remains a notable barrier to health care. (Newsbatch, 2009)
Health Care Reform
Health Informative Technology is the wave of the future, and this is never truer than for the health care industry. Health Informative Technology has the potential to slash the cost for health care. Electronic prescribing has been recommended to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services by the Medical Group Management Association; electronic prescribing is used to stimulate advancements in electronic health care. Electronic prescribing would allow other areas of health care to move more swiftly while protecting the privacy of consumer’s health information, privacy and safety while streamlining administrative procedures resulting in a reduction of administrative costs. The primary recommendations are that standards dictating electronic prescribing would be flexible, allowing for easy adjustment based on the needs of the health care organization regardless of the organization’s size, volume, or specialty; the establishment of a quantified return on investment through research and analysis; electronic prescribing systems be organized in such a way to prevent undue burden while ensuring that the technology is implemented in a timely manner; and provide an outreach program that would educated pharmacies, healthcare providers, and consumers of the benefits electronic prescribing would provide. (Medical Group Management Association, 2005)
Health care reform needs to include provisions that have no lifetime or yearly limits on coverage, no denial of coverage due to pre-existing conditions, and no cancelation or denial of coverage due to a family member getting sick. This is particularly a problem with cancer patient, diabetics, and heart patients who all too frequently find themselves facing these very issues. Reform also needs to take the focus off of providing care once an individual gets sick, to the prevention of sickness; some treatments can prevent the progression of illnesses, reverse them, and prevent additional illnesses, but they are not universally covered by insurance. A prime example of this would be weight loss surgery, although not successful in all cases, it is successful in the majority of cases and has been shown to reverse diabetes and prevent comorbid conditions like heart disease. Yet very few insurance companies will cover this type of treatment, and many individuals cannot afford the treatment without the assistance of insurance. Reform should prevent insurance companies from charging higher premiums based on health, gender, location, or age. While some individuals may be at a higher risk for some illnesses, this does not mean that health, gender, location, or age preclude the individual will create certain diseases. Is this anything short of discrimination? Americans need health care that is affordable and has the stability that currently does not exist. (Americans for Stable Quality Care, n.d.)
Can the federal government control the costs of health care? If one looks at the previous examples of federal health care spending (Medicare and Medicaid), then the answer is clearly no. The primary reason that the government cannot control the rising costs of health care is because the only successful intention to control costs is through competition: supply and demand, the very fabric this country was built on. The concept of supply and demand is the ability of the consumer to purchase in an open market the product that offers the best value for their money. This applies pressure to all the providers to lower costs in order to remain competitive in a free, open market. A consumer living in Virginia most likely will not be able to bewitch insurance from an insurance company located in California; the reason for this is that new government control limits the insurance market. If Congress passed a bill that would legalize health insurance purchases across state lines, then the colossal companies that dominate the insurance market would have to compete with all insurance companies which would effectively nick insurance premiums nationwide. (Kibbe, 2009)
The rise in healthcare costs has driven many Americans into the poverty level. This persistent rise in health care costs has slowly, but steadily, eaten into the take-home pay for American workers. Americans are crying out for health care reform that will remove the real possibility of having to ask: can I afford to steal my child to the doctor or do I go without water, food, or heat? History does repeat itself unless one takes a step back and learns from the mistakes made in the past.The earmarks of any fine health system is the ability to deliver safe, effective, high-quality, and personalized care to the people who are in need of it, when they are in need of it, and without wasting vital resources. Medicare, Medicaid, and Medicare Prescription Drug Plans are the three most influential government attempts to control the costs of health care, and all of them are failing. What the future holds for health care and if health care will become an affordable option for everyone is impossible to predict; however, one thing that all Americans can agree on is that the system and infrastructures in place now are not working and health care reform is a necessity.
References
Americans for Stable Quality Care. (n.d.). The benefits of reform: Health care reform’s impact on you and your family. Americans for Stable Quality Care. Retrieved from http://www.stablequalitycare.org/reform-benefits.shtml? sc=om-g-s-hreform
Cowan, C. & Hartman, M. (2005). Financing health care: Businesses, households, and governments, 1987-2003. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Health Care Financing Review; 1(2). Retrieved from http://www.cms.hhs.gov/HealthCareFinancingReview/Downloads/Cowan2.pdf.
Kavilanz, P. (2009). Employees face ’shockingly higher’ health costs: It’s open enrollment time. As employees nationwide peruse their benefit options, experts say prepare for ’shockingly’ higher costs. CNNMoney.com. Retrieved from
http://money.cnn.com/2009/10/19/news/economy/healthcare_openenrollment_changes/index.htm
Kibbe, M. (2009). The government can’t control health care costs. Real Clear Markets. Retreived from http://www.realclearmarkets.com/articles/2009/08/25/the_government_cant_control_health_care_costs_97374.html
Medical Group Management Association. (2005). MGMA comments on the proposed rule on electronic prescribing. Surgistrategies.com. Retrieved from http://www.surgistrategies.com/hotnews/54h1110391439390.html.
National Coalition on Health Care. (2009). Health care facts: Costs. National Coalition on Health Care. Retrieved from http://www.nchc.org/documents/Fact%20Sheets/Fact%20Sheet%20-%20Cost%20Sep-09.pdf.
Newsbatch. (2009). Health care policy issues. Newsbatch.com. Retrieved from http://www.newsbatch.com/healthcare.htm
Public Broadcasting System. (n.d.). Health care crisis. Public Broadcasting System. Retrieved from http://www.pbs.org/healthcarecrisis/history.htm.
Simon, B. (2009). Teaching and VA hospital issues: What will the physician shortage mean for you? Med Center Today. Retrieved from http://medcentertoday.com/article.php? id=64&chapter_id=1.
Steuerle, E. (2007). Is health spending out of control? National Center for Policy Analysis. Retrieved from http://www.ncpa.org/pub/ba586.